|
Post by Redwatt50 on Sept 6, 2015 15:04:56 GMT
I want to be better at being multicellular. (The predator is unicellular, right?) -2 to @bigyihsaun. Thanks StealthStyleL.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Sept 5, 2015 10:54:11 GMT
Atrox, you will need a nervous system for something like that, but if you want I could give you chemotaxis. @redwatt, do you want to reflect the heat or just be immune to it, like thermophiles? Also, all of you that are becoming multicellular, know that you will eventually need a circulatory system if you want to be large and complex. I guess I'll become immune to it.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Sept 4, 2015 14:15:04 GMT
Thanks mitobox and Theredtardis. Would it be possible to evolve some kind of cell wall that reflects heat and radiation? EDIT: +2 to Zer1000.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Sept 3, 2015 2:15:31 GMT
Hmm. I dunno when he says also I think he means that you have the option to choose between a +2 or a -1 TheCreator will probably answer this when he gets back on. But if I can only choose one, then i'll just give +2 to StealthStyleL.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Sept 2, 2015 21:13:56 GMT
I have +1 because of him. Plus, he gave me a +2 anyway. You're pure evil... Ah but the rules state you can give a player a -1 OR a +2 He gave a -1 to bigyihsuan, therefore negating your +2 Unless I completely misunderstood the rules... Actually: During your turn, you can choose to give any other player a +2 on their roll in addition to choosing your own mutation. You can also choose to give a player a -1 on their dice roll, if you want it to fail.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Sept 2, 2015 2:03:46 GMT
-1 to Bigyihsuan. The last thing I need is someone trying to eat me when i'm CR.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Sept 1, 2015 20:43:32 GMT
When is the next one going to be posted?
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Sept 1, 2015 20:26:19 GMT
I'll attempt to evolve better low pressure tolerance. +2 to StealthStyleL.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Sept 1, 2015 2:01:19 GMT
We're not sure if the game would ever make it onto steam, as its entirely free/open-source, there's no potential revenue for Valve. With that in mind, I don't think any of us have looked into steam workshop integration, which might be something to consider a very long way down the line. There's plenty of games on Steam that are completely free.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 30, 2015 19:27:53 GMT
Chloroplasts, requesting +2 too. Will there be another game when this ends? I will give you a +2 if you give me a +2? I'll give you a +2 if you give me a +2. I really don't want my roll to fail.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 30, 2015 14:24:35 GMT
I'll try to become less dense again. +2 to bigyihsuan.Can someone please +2 me? EDIT: +2 to Atrox instead.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 29, 2015 2:16:34 GMT
I found this on the development forums:
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 28, 2015 14:38:21 GMT
I'll try to become multicellular again, and +2 to Atrox.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 26, 2015 14:30:50 GMT
I don't really have much else to evolve as a single cell. Time to go multicellular. Also, +2 to Theredtardis.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 25, 2015 16:29:55 GMT
Okay then, would it be possible to evolve a vacuole-like organelle that is filled with hydrogen? No problem. It would take quite a bit of energy to create hydrogen from water, but if you want to, go for it! You could also do what mitobox is suggesting. Tell me what you decide. Mitobox's suggestion sounds like a pretty good idea, so i'll use it. EDIT: The one that involves making my cell less dense.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 25, 2015 3:33:46 GMT
I want to evolve some kind of hydrogen sac, so I can float to the surface and receive more sunlight. I'll also give +2 to mitobox. You are currently a single-celled organism, so you will need to make another vote. Okay then, would it be possible to evolve a vacuole-like organelle that is filled with hydrogen?
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 24, 2015 18:12:14 GMT
I want to evolve some kind of hydrogen sac, so I can float to the surface and receive more sunlight. I'll also give +2 to mitobox.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 23, 2015 20:04:37 GMT
I've run forum games where there were more than a dozen players. It takes a while to get to everyone, but you can do it. Yeah, but I want to have daily updates and writing up a post for each species does take quite a bit of time. Next time I'll try to make a team based game, so anyone will be able to join. mrnom, sorry, but I've reached my limit. Well, a super evolution will always be good for your species (and as the GM I always know what is best for your species). I disagree that in a lot it would be similar to rolling just a five, since very rarely will you vote for something like an immunity to a certain virus. The span between rounds is a very long time so your votes would be more like "Improve immune system" or "Develop better green camouflage". As for Atrox's two legs example you wouldn't get 4 legs; rather, you would get 2 really good legs. Obviously these really good legs would be different for different survival strategies, but I will always give you something that benefits your species the most. In two games like this that I already ran (and numerous other games that used my idea) the Super Evolution thing worked out perfectly and I never received a single complaint. If I have still not persuaded you, let's continue to talk; I am very open to suggestion as to how I can make this game better. deandactyl, the rounds do not have a specific time assigned to them. I post them as soon as I finish and I work on them at very different parts of the day. The idea of it didn't sound very good on paper, but if it has worked well in the past then I can't complain.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 22, 2015 19:29:54 GMT
This might be a bit late, but I think you should change what super evolution does. In a lot of cases super evolution would either be the exact same thing as rolling a 5 (Example: wanting immunity to a certain virus. If you're immune to it, then there is no point in becoming immune to it again.), or even worse than rolling a 5 (Look at atrox's two legs example. What if your species would be better off with two legs rather than four?). I have some ideas of what it could do instead: A) It does the same thing as if you rolled a 6, but it also changes your next roll to the following: 1 - The mutation partially succeeds 2 - The mutation partially succeeds 3 - You get exactly what you asked for 4 - You get exactly what you asked for 5 - You get an even better mutation then the one you asked for 6 - You get an even better mutation then the one you asked for 8 - SUPER EVOLUTION! B) It does the same thing as if you rolled a 5, but on your next turn you get to ask for another mutation alongside the one you already asked for. That mutation will always be exactly what was asked for. I think if you get super evolution, you should be able to just roll for another mutation in that same turn. The second roll cannot be another super mutation though. That would make getting super evolution risky though, especially because you probably won't be able to get any +2s on the second roll. I think getting that high of a number should be 100% award with no risk.
|
|
|
Post by Redwatt50 on Aug 22, 2015 17:01:24 GMT
This might be a bit late, but I think you should change what super evolution does. In a lot of cases super evolution would either be the exact same thing as rolling a 5 (Example: wanting immunity to a certain virus. If you're immune to it, then there is no point in becoming immune to it again.), or even worse than rolling a 5 (Look at atrox's two legs example. What if your species would be better off with two legs rather than four?).
I have some ideas of what it could do instead:
A) It does the same thing as if you rolled a 6, but it also changes your next roll to the following:
1 - The mutation partially succeeds 2 - The mutation partially succeeds 3 - You get exactly what you asked for 4 - You get exactly what you asked for 5 - You get an even better mutation then the one you asked for 6 - You get an even better mutation then the one you asked for 8 - SUPER EVOLUTION!
B) It does the same thing as if you rolled a 5, but on your next turn you get to ask for another mutation alongside the one you already asked for. That mutation will always be exactly what was asked for.
|
|